To pre-designate future human persons as involuntary test subjects of an unproven technology would be a totalitarian act, and is the real ethical reason why human reproductive cloning should remain prohibited, and not vacuous arguments that are offensive to identical twins.
Would that have been a benefit to humanity? Without this gene, the animals are highly susceptible to infections. Cloning shall eliminate this surprise factor from the entire human race. We may learn to grow nerves or the spinal cord back again when they are injured.
So that would mean creating cloned embryos, implanting them and destroying presumably those that look imperfect as they grow in the womb.
There might emerge cases when the human being may not have the desired characteristics, and since creation of perfect people is possible, the original human being may be rejected socially.
A big problem lies in the social acceptance of clones. Because, without the truth, we all just as well be living on a flat-earth in an earth centered solar system.
It requires technically sophisticated resources for which one may have to shell out a lot of money. Its humans against clones when it comes to competing for natural resources. Human cloning would also help people who are suffering from infertility.
Other researchers have also shown clones to have excessive obesity, birth defects and a high rate of death immediately after birth. Do you really think cloning more people is the solution? Cloning will mean bringing in identical genes, which will naturally weaken our power to adapt to different circumstances.
Since genes can be tricky, recessive genes may show up too late in a clone, and a whole line of people may get affected.
God did not create cloning. What if we allow human cloning to go unchecked? Against the law of nature: With the technology of genetic engineering in humans, an entire new race of higher minds will be created. The clones were found to suffer from severe penumonia and liver failure. Not just yours, the identity of the clone too shall be a problem.
This clone is cold and deceitful making it very difficult for you to live with it. Human cloning holds the power like no other to free humanity at all levels. But what does this research mean practically? Since genes can be tricky, recessive genes may show up too late in a clone, and a whole line of people may get affected.
In fact, there shall be no further evolution of human race. Are you sure you want to delete this answer? In fact, there shall be no further evolution of human race. Int J Public Opin Res No for cloning.
Cloning is the Worst Idea Ever Human or any kind of cloning is a terrible idea. According to jimmyhogg.com, there is a risk of a high failure rate, problems later during development, a chance or abnormal gene experession patterns, and. Dec 15, · This Site Might Help You. RE: Cloning - the good and bad sides?
Hello, I'm kinda interested what are the good and the bad sides of cloning people (humans) as in cloning them for a eventual replacement of damaged or old organs. jimmyhogg.com: Resolved.
If human cloning is carried out, it may well lead to uncontrolled results, abnormal development, genetic damage, malformation and diseases in the clone.
Even if cloning is successful, the life of the clone will probably be a drastic one with a much shorter span. Is Cloning Good or Bad? This article describes the benefits and problems associated with the technology of cloning, and tries to answer the question that whether it is good or bad for the progress of mankind.
BiologyWise Staff. The Good Side of Cloning. Good news! Cloning can cure genetic diseases! Bad News! You die younger. The scientific press has recently thrown up both good news and bad news for those of us interested in the field of cloning.
Is ‘cloning' mad, bad and dangerous? Lee Turnpenny 1 1 Lee Turnpenny is a Senior Research Fellow in the Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells & Regeneration, and the Human Genetics Division, at the University of Southampton, UK.Download